• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
El-Batal, M., Abdo, F., Abdel-Gawad, M. (2009). PHENOLOGICAL STAGES AND GROWING DEGREE DAYS FOR DIFFERENT SOYBEAN CULTIVARS. Journal of Plant Production, 34(4), 3639-3650. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2009.117189
M. A. El-Batal; Fatma A. Abdo; M. H. Abdel-Gawad. "PHENOLOGICAL STAGES AND GROWING DEGREE DAYS FOR DIFFERENT SOYBEAN CULTIVARS". Journal of Plant Production, 34, 4, 2009, 3639-3650. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2009.117189
El-Batal, M., Abdo, F., Abdel-Gawad, M. (2009). 'PHENOLOGICAL STAGES AND GROWING DEGREE DAYS FOR DIFFERENT SOYBEAN CULTIVARS', Journal of Plant Production, 34(4), pp. 3639-3650. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2009.117189
El-Batal, M., Abdo, F., Abdel-Gawad, M. PHENOLOGICAL STAGES AND GROWING DEGREE DAYS FOR DIFFERENT SOYBEAN CULTIVARS. Journal of Plant Production, 2009; 34(4): 3639-3650. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2009.117189

PHENOLOGICAL STAGES AND GROWING DEGREE DAYS FOR DIFFERENT SOYBEAN CULTIVARS

Article 27, Volume 34, Issue 4, April 2009, Page 3639-3650  XML PDF (558.19 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2009.117189
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
M. A. El-Batal; Fatma A. Abdo; M. H. Abdel-Gawad
Crop Physiol. Dept., Field Crop Res. Inst., Agric. Res. Center, Giza, Egypt
Abstract
Ninesoybean cultivars belonging to different maturity groups (MG) in the green house of Crop Physiol. Res. Dept., Giza, 2007 and 2008 seasons. The main objectives were to study the initiation and duration of the different growth stages, growing degree days (GDD) and heat unit efficiency (HUE) in relation to yield and other plant traits.
            Results indicated that completely unrolled leaf at unifoliolate node (V1) needed about 191oC GDD and this amount was almost constant for cultivars. Number of days (ND) and GDD accumulation for the initiation of reproductive stages varied significantly among cultivars. The earliest cultivar was "Giza 83" (MG II), while the latest was either "Holladay" or "Toano" (MG V). Cultivars of MG IV, i.e., "Giza 21", "Giza 22", "Giza 111" and "Crawford" needed  more days to the initiation of reproductive stages than those of "Giza 35" (MG III) or MGII cultivars. Similar results were obtained when GDD was taken into consideration.
            There were significant differences among cultivars in the length of vegetative growth, flowering period, pod formation, seed filling and reproductive growth durations and their degree days sum. "Giza 83" had the shortest stage durations and needed the lowest GDD for full rate of phenological stage. However, "Holladay" and "Toano" had the longest durations and accumulated the most GDD during all developmental stages. Other cultivars were in-between, due to their maturity groups.
            Cultivars of MG V surpassed the others in plant traits and yield, while "Giza 83" (MG II) had the lowest values of these traits and the rest cultivars were in-between. Concerning HUE in seed yield, all cultivars followed the same trend of their productivity with no significant differences between MG IV and MG V cultivars.
Keywords
Soybean; cultivars; growing degree days; phenological stages
Statistics
Article View: 218
PDF Download: 1,143
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.