• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Moussa, A. (2010). ESTIMATION OF EPISTASIS, ADDITIVE AND DOMINANCE VARIATION IN CERTAIN BREAD WHEAT (Triticum aestivum, L) CROSSES. Journal of Plant Production, 1(12), 1707-1719. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2010.86614
A. M. Moussa. "ESTIMATION OF EPISTASIS, ADDITIVE AND DOMINANCE VARIATION IN CERTAIN BREAD WHEAT (Triticum aestivum, L) CROSSES". Journal of Plant Production, 1, 12, 2010, 1707-1719. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2010.86614
Moussa, A. (2010). 'ESTIMATION OF EPISTASIS, ADDITIVE AND DOMINANCE VARIATION IN CERTAIN BREAD WHEAT (Triticum aestivum, L) CROSSES', Journal of Plant Production, 1(12), pp. 1707-1719. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2010.86614
Moussa, A. ESTIMATION OF EPISTASIS, ADDITIVE AND DOMINANCE VARIATION IN CERTAIN BREAD WHEAT (Triticum aestivum, L) CROSSES. Journal of Plant Production, 2010; 1(12): 1707-1719. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2010.86614

ESTIMATION OF EPISTASIS, ADDITIVE AND DOMINANCE VARIATION IN CERTAIN BREAD WHEAT (Triticum aestivum, L) CROSSES

Article 12, Volume 1, Issue 12, December 2010, Page 1707-1719  XML PDF (529.76 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2010.86614
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
A. M. Moussa*
National Wheat Research Program, Field Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.
Abstract
This investigation wascarried out at El-Gemmeiza Agric. Res. Station, ARC, Egypt, during the three successive seasons, 2006/2007, 2007/2008,and 2008/2009 to study heterosis, heritability in addition to determining the adequacy of genetic model controlling the genetic system for some economic traits.
Six population (P1, P2, F1, F2, Bc1 and Bc2 ) for three crosses were used in this study coming through four bread wheat genotypes. These crosses were PBW343 x Sakha94, Gemmeiza 9 x Sakha line and Sakha 94 x Gemmeiza 9.  Analysis of variance showed a significant differences among the studied generations means for all studied traits. Scaling test showed that most studied characters were significant indicating the presence of non- allelic interactions. Dominance gene effects were generally higher in magnitude than additive ones in the three crosses, indicating that dominant genes playing important role in the inheritance of such traits beside the additive one. The hybrid (Gemmeiza 9 x Sakha line) gave a highly significant (aa ), (ad ) and (dd ) with positive values for number of days to heading and number of kernels / spike indicating the importance of gene interactions in the genetic system. On the other hand, the (aa ) negative values obtained for number of spikes / plant and grain yield / plant in the first cross indicate that the materials used in this study have a decreasing alleles expression which makes improving it through selection in the early generations could not be effective.
The second cross gave the highest negative heterotic effect towards earliness for number of days to heading and number of days to maturity with moderate heritability in narrow sense and with a genetic advance being 5.05 and 5.39 day for both characters, respectively. Significant positive heterotic effects relative to better parent  were obtained for number of kernels/spike and 100- kernel weight in the first and second cross and number of spikes/ plant, 100- kernel weight and grain yield / plant in the third one.
Statistics
Article View: 207
PDF Download: 427
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.