• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Mostafa, M., El-Baz, E., Abd El-Wahab, A., Omar, A. (2011). USING DIFFERENT SOURCES OF COMPOST TEA ON GRAPES. Journal of Plant Production, 2(7), 935-947. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2011.85627
M. F. M. Mostafa; E. l-S. El-B. T. El-Baz; A. F. Abd El-Wahab; Asmaa S. M. Omar. "USING DIFFERENT SOURCES OF COMPOST TEA ON GRAPES". Journal of Plant Production, 2, 7, 2011, 935-947. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2011.85627
Mostafa, M., El-Baz, E., Abd El-Wahab, A., Omar, A. (2011). 'USING DIFFERENT SOURCES OF COMPOST TEA ON GRAPES', Journal of Plant Production, 2(7), pp. 935-947. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2011.85627
Mostafa, M., El-Baz, E., Abd El-Wahab, A., Omar, A. USING DIFFERENT SOURCES OF COMPOST TEA ON GRAPES. Journal of Plant Production, 2011; 2(7): 935-947. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2011.85627

USING DIFFERENT SOURCES OF COMPOST TEA ON GRAPES

Article 7, Volume 2, Issue 7, July 2011, Page 935-947  XML PDF (482.73 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2011.85627
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
M. F. M. Mostafa1; E. l-S. El-B. T. El-Baz2; A. F. Abd El-Wahab3; Asmaa S. M. Omar1
1Pomology Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University.
2Pomology Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University
3Water, Soil and Environment Research Institute, ARC, Cairo.
Abstract
The present investigation was carried out during 3 successive seasons from 2008 to 2010. The work in the first year was considered as a preliminary trial. This investigation was conducted on 14-year-old King Ruby grapevines cultivar growing at a private vineyard called Chycheny located at meniet samanood village near Mansoura city, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of different sources of compost tea with or without citric acid on vegetative growth, leaf mineral content, physical and chemical characteristics of clusters and berries, yield and pruning wood weight.
Most tested treatments gave generally a significant increase of different studied parameters especially in the second season of study, where, T7 (compost tea A + compost tea B + citric acid) gave  the highest significant increase in shoot length and total chlorophyll  content (112.1 - 144.6 cm), (1.013 - 0.957 mg/g F.W.)  as compared with that of control (91.2 - 112.6 cm), (0.923 - 0.695 mg/g F.W.) in 2009 and 2010 seasons, respectively. In addition, T7 gave a significant increase of NPK content in the leaf petioles (2.94 and 2.72 N %), (0.43 and 0.43 P%) and (2.11 and 2.12 K%)  as compared with that of control (2.39 and 2.37 N%), (0.27 and 0.27 P%) and (1.16 and 1.17 K%) in 2009 and 2010 seasons, respectively. Also, this treatment gave a pronounced increase in yield/vine (15.90 and 12.00 kg/vine)  as compared with that of control (9.03 and 8.07 kg/vine) in 2009 and 2010 seasons, respectively. Same treatments gave higher increase in the total sugars and total anthocyanin content in berry skin (17.133 – 17.577 %), (45.85 – 50.14 mg/100g)  as compared with that of control (14.19 and 14.56 %), (23.52 and 23.08 mg/100g) in 2009 and 2010 seasons, respectively. Also, T7 gave the highest values on weight of pruning wood at winter season (2.63 and 2.83 kg/vine) comparing with control (2.17 and 1.78 kg/vine) in 2009 and 2010 seasons, respectively.
Statistics
Article View: 264
PDF Download: 541
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.