• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Tagour, R., Abd El-Hamed, G., Mousa, R., Sarhan, H. (2012). INTEGRATION EFFECTS OF MULCHING AND BURNING WITH HOEING ON SUGAR BEET AND ASSOCIATED WEEDS.. Journal of Plant Production, 3(5), 715-727. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2012.84211
R. M. H. Tagour; G. M. Abd El-Hamed; R. A. Mousa; H. M. Sarhan. "INTEGRATION EFFECTS OF MULCHING AND BURNING WITH HOEING ON SUGAR BEET AND ASSOCIATED WEEDS.". Journal of Plant Production, 3, 5, 2012, 715-727. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2012.84211
Tagour, R., Abd El-Hamed, G., Mousa, R., Sarhan, H. (2012). 'INTEGRATION EFFECTS OF MULCHING AND BURNING WITH HOEING ON SUGAR BEET AND ASSOCIATED WEEDS.', Journal of Plant Production, 3(5), pp. 715-727. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2012.84211
Tagour, R., Abd El-Hamed, G., Mousa, R., Sarhan, H. INTEGRATION EFFECTS OF MULCHING AND BURNING WITH HOEING ON SUGAR BEET AND ASSOCIATED WEEDS.. Journal of Plant Production, 2012; 3(5): 715-727. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2012.84211

INTEGRATION EFFECTS OF MULCHING AND BURNING WITH HOEING ON SUGAR BEET AND ASSOCIATED WEEDS.

Article 1, Volume 3, Issue 5, May 2012, Page 715-727  XML PDF (471.8 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2012.84211
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
R. M. H. Tagour1; G. M. Abd El-Hamed1; R. A. Mousa1; H. M. Sarhan2
1Weed Res. Cent. Lab., Agric. Res. Cent., Giza, Egypt.
2Sugar Crops Res. Instit., Agric. Res. Cent., Giza, Egypt.
Abstract
           Two field experiments were carried out during 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 winter seasons to evaluate the effect of some non-traditional methods for weed control which are being (mulching by rice straw and burning has been carried after ridging and directly before sowing) on growth, yield and juice quality as well as associated weeds of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris, L.) grown in salinity soil condition at El-Serw Research Station.
The most important results obtained could be summarized as follows:
- All weed control treatments reduced significantly fresh weight (g/m2) of broad-leaf, grassy and total weeds growth which associated with sugar beet plants, dry weight and total of sugar beet weeds as compared to the unweeded check.
- Two hoeing with mulching was the most effective on controlling weeds (91.1-92.2%) followed by one hoeing with mulching (85.9-86.5%) and burning with two hoeing (82.8-84.2%), respectively. 
- Application of two hoeing improved drastically the efficiency of the mulching and burning in controlling sugar beet weeds when compared with other treatments.
- The results show that two hoeing with mulching resulted in good control of total weeds after 120 days from sowing (DAS).
- All growth criteria i.e., plant height (cm), leaves number/plant, root/top ratio and root characters responded significantly to two hoeing with mulching followed by one hoeing with mulching and burning with two hoeing , respectively, as compared with the untreated treatment.
- Concerning the effect of weed control methods treatments on yield components of sugar beet plants, corresponding data cleared that two hoeing with mulching gave the highest values of tops, roots, biological and sugar yields.
- Application of hoeing with mulching or burning caused significant increases in values of juice quality parameters i.e., sucrose and purity % as compared with the untreated treatment.
- Generally, it can be concluded that application of two or one hoeing with mulching of rice straw and burning with two hoeing were the recommended treatments for obtaining the highest growth, yield and juice quality of sugar beet plants as well as significant reduction in total weeds under salinity lands condition at El-Serw.
 This study suggest that non traditional weed control by mulching or burning can be used in compatible manner with mechanical hoeing in integrated weed strategy in sugar beet.          
Statistics
Article View: 125
PDF Download: 363
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.