• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Ahmed, A., Meleha, M. (2012). RESPONSE OF RICE PRODUCTIVITY TO MINERAL AND ORGANIC FERTILIZERS UNDER TWO PLANTING METHODS. Journal of Plant Production, 3(3), 525-534. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2012.84191
A. A. Ahmed; M. E. Meleha. "RESPONSE OF RICE PRODUCTIVITY TO MINERAL AND ORGANIC FERTILIZERS UNDER TWO PLANTING METHODS". Journal of Plant Production, 3, 3, 2012, 525-534. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2012.84191
Ahmed, A., Meleha, M. (2012). 'RESPONSE OF RICE PRODUCTIVITY TO MINERAL AND ORGANIC FERTILIZERS UNDER TWO PLANTING METHODS', Journal of Plant Production, 3(3), pp. 525-534. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2012.84191
Ahmed, A., Meleha, M. RESPONSE OF RICE PRODUCTIVITY TO MINERAL AND ORGANIC FERTILIZERS UNDER TWO PLANTING METHODS. Journal of Plant Production, 2012; 3(3): 525-534. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2012.84191

RESPONSE OF RICE PRODUCTIVITY TO MINERAL AND ORGANIC FERTILIZERS UNDER TWO PLANTING METHODS

Article 8, Volume 3, Issue 3, March 2012, Page 525-534  XML PDF (384.38 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2012.84191
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
A. A. Ahmed1; M. E. Meleha2
1Agronomy Dept., Fac. of Agric., Kafrelsheikh Univ., Egypt.
2Water Management Res. Inst., National Water Res. Centre, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract
Two field experiments were conducted at the Experimental Farm of Water Requirements Research Station, Kafrelsheikh Governorate, North Delta, Water Management Research Institute, National Water Research Centre, Egypt,during 2010 and 2011 seasons, to study the effect of mineral and organic nitrogen fertilizers on rice productivity under traditional transplanting and transplanting in bottom of beds methods  and so on water saving and its use effeciency under the conditions of Kafrelsheikh Governorate for rice cultivar Sakha 105. Fertilizer treatments were as following (160 kg N/ha, 120 kg N/+ 5 tons compost/ ha and 80 kg N + 5 tons compost/ ha). Treatments were arranged in split plot design with four replicates. The main plots included the two planting methods, while, the three fertilizer treatments were allocated at the sub plots. The obtained results could be summarized as follows:
The results reveal that the method of planting in bottom of beds led to significantly increased in dry weight at heading, 1000 grain weight, grain yield and harvest index in both seasons as well as number of grains/panicle in the second season compared with the method of traditional transplanting, which recorded a highly significant values in plant height, number of panicles/hill in both seasons and straw yield in the second season.
 Data show that planting in bottom of beds led to significant increase in water use efficiency and achieved water saving of 4798 and 4788 m3/ha ( 2016 and 2012 m3/fed.) in the first and second seasons, respectively as compared with traditional transplanting method.
The obtained results show that application of mineral nitrogen 120 kg N in combined with 5 tons compost/ha significantly recorded the highest  values of  plant height number of panicles/hill, number of grains/panicle, 1000 grain weight,grain and straw yields and harvest index in both seasons as well as  dry weight only in the first season .
The treatment of 160 kg N/ha didn't significantly differed with the treatment of 120 kg N + 5 tons compost/ha in 1000 grain weight in the first season, grain yield in the second season and harvest index in both seasons.
From the obtained results under these conditions of this study, it could be concluded that planting rice in bottom of beds saved water in average of 4793 m3/ha and increased water use efficiency as compared with traditional transplanting. Also,  application of 5 tons compost plus 120 kg N/ha gave the highest productivity of rice cultivar Sakha 105 Kafrelsheikh.
Keywords
Rice; yield; planting method; traditional transplanting; beds transplanting; compost; N fertilizer
Statistics
Article View: 105
PDF Download: 345
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.