• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Ghareeb, Z., Ibrahim, H., Elsheikh, S., Bachoash, S. (2014). GENOTYPE × ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION FOR CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME SUGAR BEET GENOTYPES. Journal of Plant Production, 5(5), 853-867. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2014.55434
Zeinab E. Ghareeb; Hoda E. A. Ibrahim; S. R. E. Elsheikh; S. M. I. Bachoash. "GENOTYPE × ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION FOR CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME SUGAR BEET GENOTYPES". Journal of Plant Production, 5, 5, 2014, 853-867. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2014.55434
Ghareeb, Z., Ibrahim, H., Elsheikh, S., Bachoash, S. (2014). 'GENOTYPE × ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION FOR CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME SUGAR BEET GENOTYPES', Journal of Plant Production, 5(5), pp. 853-867. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2014.55434
Ghareeb, Z., Ibrahim, H., Elsheikh, S., Bachoash, S. GENOTYPE × ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION FOR CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME SUGAR BEET GENOTYPES. Journal of Plant Production, 2014; 5(5): 853-867. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2014.55434

GENOTYPE × ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION FOR CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME SUGAR BEET GENOTYPES

Article 9, Volume 5, Issue 5, May 2014, Page 853-867  XML PDF (645.7 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2014.55434
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Zeinab E. Ghareeb1; Hoda E. A. Ibrahim1; S. R. E. Elsheikh2; S. M. I. Bachoash2
1Center Lab. For Design and Stat. Anal. Res., ARC, Giza. Egypt.
2Sugar Crops Res. Institute, ARC, Giza, Egypt
Abstract
In order to study the effect of genotype × environment interaction and stability of sugar beet genotypes for seven cultivars, viz Lilly, DS 9004, Gazella, Oscar Poly, Pather, Toro and Hercule. A field trail was sown in eight environments as major four locations (Sakha, Giza, El-Fayoum and Malawy) for two years (2011/12 and 2012/13) using a randomized complete block design, with three replications. Analysis of variance for root yield, sugar yield and sugar content showed that the environment and genotype and genotype × environment interaction (GEI) were significant. GEI were evaluated by two methods (phenotypic stability and AMMI model).
According to phenotypic stability analysis results, genotype (Lilly) was the most stable for sugar content and root and sugar yield. This genotype recorded the highest root and sugar yield (30.34 and 5.22 ton/fed, respectively) across environments, and Sakha environment had the highest mean values of environments followed by El-Fayoum environment.
AMMI model explained most of the genotype × environment interaction (85.97%, 83.34 % and 86.47 %) for root yield, sugar content and, sugar yield, respectively. Lilly was the best genotype based on the biplot, and showed specific adaptation to Sakha and El-Fayoum location. The varieties Pather, Hercule and Toro were the lowest variety among the evaluated varieties and it is better not to use it in the studied areas. The genotypes Gazella, Oscar poly and DS9004 had an average genetic potential for the studied traits, but its high general adaptability, then it could be introduced for all areas. Among the locations, Sakha was the best location, and was more similar to El-Fayoum. Meanwhile, Malawy was the poorest location.
Therefore, two stability methods confirmed that Sakha and El-Fayoum are recommended as suitable regions for sowing sugar beet and Lilly variety could be suggested as the best genotype for these locations. Meanwhile, AMMI method showed new information.
Keywords
Phenotypic stability; AMMI; genotype × environment interaction; stability; Sugar beet
Statistics
Article View: 454
PDF Download: 434
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.