• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Gouda, A., Gahwash, M., Abdel- Kader, A. (2015). RESPONSE OF POTATO GROWTH AND YIELD TO SOME STIMULATING COMPOUNDS.. Journal of Plant Production, 6(8), 1293-1302. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2015.51741
A. E. A. I. Gouda; M. N. M. A. Gahwash; A. E. Abdel- Kader. "RESPONSE OF POTATO GROWTH AND YIELD TO SOME STIMULATING COMPOUNDS.". Journal of Plant Production, 6, 8, 2015, 1293-1302. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2015.51741
Gouda, A., Gahwash, M., Abdel- Kader, A. (2015). 'RESPONSE OF POTATO GROWTH AND YIELD TO SOME STIMULATING COMPOUNDS.', Journal of Plant Production, 6(8), pp. 1293-1302. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2015.51741
Gouda, A., Gahwash, M., Abdel- Kader, A. RESPONSE OF POTATO GROWTH AND YIELD TO SOME STIMULATING COMPOUNDS.. Journal of Plant Production, 2015; 6(8): 1293-1302. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2015.51741

RESPONSE OF POTATO GROWTH AND YIELD TO SOME STIMULATING COMPOUNDS.

Article 2, Volume 6, Issue 8, August 2015, Page 1293-1302  XML PDF (441.92 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2015.51741
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
A. E. A. I. Gouda1; M. N. M. A. Gahwash2; A. E. Abdel- Kader2
1Veg. Res. Dep., Hort.Res.Inst.,Agric.Res.Center,Giza,Egypt.
2Veg. Res. Dep., Hort. Res. Inst., Agric. Res. Center,Giza,Egypt.
Abstract
Two field experiments were carried out at the private Farm in Basandela Village, Belqas, Dakahlia Governorate during the two successive summer seasons of 2012 and 2013 to study the response of potato (c.v. Valor) growth and yield to some stimulating compounds i.e, Thiamine(V.B1)100 ppm, Riboflaphine(V.B2)100 ppm, Ascorbic acid (V.C)100 ppm, Decenyl succinic acid (DSA) 400 ppm, Arginine acid 400 ppm, Proline acid 400 ppm and Micronutrients (Fe, Zn and Mn) each 75 ppm .
Results indicated that plant height and number of leaves/plant were significantly increased with application of Decenyl  saccinic  acid (DSA) compared with other treatments in both seasons of study.  Number of branches/ plant and number of stoolens /plant were significantly increased with application of proline acid compared with the control.  Leaf area was significantly increased with foliar application of Ascorbic acid in both seasons of study.
Total yield (tones / fed.), average tuber weight and marketable yield of tubers were increased significantly with application of  Ascorbic acid (100 ppm) followed by the Arginine acid compared with other treatments. The foliar application of Arginine acid increased the content of tuber from N%,P% and K%  in both seasons of study compared with the other treatments. On the other hand, all treatments significantly decreased the content of No3=  and  No2=   in the tubers at harvest compared with the control treatment while, the lowest values of  No3=  and  No2=  had beenobtained after the foliar application of  Arginine acid in both seasons. Therefore, this treatment could be recommended for raising potato production and quality under similar conditions to this work. 
Statistics
Article View: 237
PDF Download: 898
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.