• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Sadek, M., Abd El-Haleem, R., Abo- Kaied, H. (2015). 20EVALUATION OF YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS FOR SIXTEEN FLAX GENOTYPES UNDER NORMAL AND SANDY SOIL CONDITIONS. Journal of Plant Production, 6(7), 1217-1230. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2015.51235
Maysa S. A. Al. Sadek; R. A. Abd El-Haleem; H. M. H. Abo- Kaied. "20EVALUATION OF YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS FOR SIXTEEN FLAX GENOTYPES UNDER NORMAL AND SANDY SOIL CONDITIONS". Journal of Plant Production, 6, 7, 2015, 1217-1230. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2015.51235
Sadek, M., Abd El-Haleem, R., Abo- Kaied, H. (2015). '20EVALUATION OF YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS FOR SIXTEEN FLAX GENOTYPES UNDER NORMAL AND SANDY SOIL CONDITIONS', Journal of Plant Production, 6(7), pp. 1217-1230. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2015.51235
Sadek, M., Abd El-Haleem, R., Abo- Kaied, H. 20EVALUATION OF YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS FOR SIXTEEN FLAX GENOTYPES UNDER NORMAL AND SANDY SOIL CONDITIONS. Journal of Plant Production, 2015; 6(7): 1217-1230. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2015.51235

20EVALUATION OF YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS FOR SIXTEEN FLAX GENOTYPES UNDER NORMAL AND SANDY SOIL CONDITIONS

Article 10, Volume 6, Issue 7, July 2015, Page 1217-1230  XML PDF (464.63 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2015.51235
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Maysa S. A. Al. Sadek; R. A. Abd El-Haleem; H. M. H. Abo- Kaied
Fiber Crops Res. Dep., Field Crops Res .Inst., A.R.C., Giza
Abstract
The present investigation was conducted using sixteen flax genotypes, thirteen local lines and three commercial varieties (Giza 8, Sakha 1 and Sakha 3) as check. These sixteen genotypes were evaluated in two successive seasons (2012/2013 and 2013/14) at two locations viz: Giza Exp. Station, Giza Governorate (normal soil) and Ismailia Exp. Station, Ismailia Governorate (sandy soil). The experimental design was randomized complete block with three replications per each of the four environments (combination of locations x years).
Mean squares due to genotypes (G) showed highly significant for all characters, indicating the presence of genetic variability among the tested genotypes for all traits under study. Mean squares due to locations (L) differed highly significantly for all traits except no. of seeds per capsule, indicating a wide range of variation between the two locations under study. Mean squares due to GL interaction were comparable in magnitude to those of GY for straw, long fiber yields per fad, plant height, technical stem length, seed yield per fad, oil yield per fad, 1000-seed weight and no. of capsules per plant, indicating that location had the major effect on the relative genotypic potential of these treats. This means that for reliable evaluation of the previous traits it would certainly be necessary to test genotypes in more than multi-location testing. Interaction components variances (σ2gl, σ2gy and σ2gly) were less than the genotypic variance (σ2g) for all characters. This means that genotypes differ in their genetic potential for these traits. This was reflected in high heritability in broad sense and low discrepancy between phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of variability specially for long fiber percentage, plant height, technical stem length, 1000-seed weight, no. of capsules per plant and oil percentage. These results indicating the possibility of using both of plant height and technical stem length as selection indices for improving straw weight per plant and using both of 1000-seed weight and no. of capsules per plant for improving seed weight per plant.
S.541-D/10 and S.541-C/3 proved maximum mean performance for straw, long fiber yields per fed, plant height and technical stem length as well as long fiber percentage when compared with the three check varieties, Giza 8, Sakha 1 and Sakha 3. Also, S.541-C/3 and S.541-D/10 exhibited high tolerance to sandy soil conditions for both straw yield per fed and fiber yield per fad. Therefore the two promising lines, S.541-C/3 and S.541-D/10 may be consider good substitutes for the low yielding ones, Giza 8, Sakha 1 and Sakha 3 in future as a new Egyptian flax cultivars for both straw and fiber yields. Also, S.541-C/3, S.541-D/10 and Sakha1 exhibited highest values for seed yield per fad, oil yield per fad, seed weight per plant and 1000-seed weight than other genotypes. It can be concluded that, S.541-D/10 gave high yielding ability for seed yield/fad, oil yield per fad, seed weight per plant and oil percentage with moderate tolerant to drought. Although, the promising flax line S.541-C/3 gave high mean performance for seed yield per fad, oil yield per fad, seed weight per plant and oil percentage but exhibited low tolerant to sandy soil conditions.
Keywords
Flax; variability; Drought tolerance and susceptibility index
Statistics
Article View: 155
PDF Download: 389
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.