• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Dawa, K., Abd El-Nabi, H., Swelam, W. (2017). Response of Tomato Plants to Irrigation with Magnetized Water and some Foliar Application Treatments under Drip Irrigation System: 1- Vegetative Growth and Chemical Constituents of Leaves.. Journal of Plant Production, 8(11), 1127-1133. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2017.41130
K. K. Dawa; H. M. E. Abd El-Nabi; W. M. E. Swelam. "Response of Tomato Plants to Irrigation with Magnetized Water and some Foliar Application Treatments under Drip Irrigation System: 1- Vegetative Growth and Chemical Constituents of Leaves.". Journal of Plant Production, 8, 11, 2017, 1127-1133. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2017.41130
Dawa, K., Abd El-Nabi, H., Swelam, W. (2017). 'Response of Tomato Plants to Irrigation with Magnetized Water and some Foliar Application Treatments under Drip Irrigation System: 1- Vegetative Growth and Chemical Constituents of Leaves.', Journal of Plant Production, 8(11), pp. 1127-1133. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2017.41130
Dawa, K., Abd El-Nabi, H., Swelam, W. Response of Tomato Plants to Irrigation with Magnetized Water and some Foliar Application Treatments under Drip Irrigation System: 1- Vegetative Growth and Chemical Constituents of Leaves.. Journal of Plant Production, 2017; 8(11): 1127-1133. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2017.41130

Response of Tomato Plants to Irrigation with Magnetized Water and some Foliar Application Treatments under Drip Irrigation System: 1- Vegetative Growth and Chemical Constituents of Leaves.

Article 9, Volume 8, Issue 11, November 2017, Page 1127-1133  XML PDF (276.65 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2017.41130
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
K. K. Dawa; H. M. E. Abd El-Nabi; W. M. E. Swelam
Veget. and Flori. Dept. Fac. Agric., Mans. Univ., Egypt.
Abstract
This experiment was conducted in summer seasons of 2016 and 2017 on tomato plants "6112" hybrid to evaluate tomato plants performance (vegetative growth characteristics and chemical constituents of leaves) in response to irrigation water treatments (magnetized and non-magnetized), foliar applications (chitosan, lithovit, selenium and yeast extract) and their interactions. Results indicated that the highest values of vegetative growth characteristics, i.e., plant height, number of branches, number of leaves, leaf area, fresh and dry weights as well as chemical constituents of leavesas photosynthetic pigments (Chl. a, Chl. b, total Chl. a+b and carotenoids) and leaf minerals content (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Zn, Mn) were recorded when plants irrigated with magnetized water as compared with plants irrigated with untreated water in both studying seasons. On the other hand, Fe content responded negatively to irrigation with magnetized water.Comparing the effect of foliar applications, all foliar application treatments significantly enhanced vegetative growth parameters, leaf minerals and pigments contents compared to the check treatment. Foliar application of chitosan at 250 ppm is the superior in its effect on all the aforementioned characteristics followed by yeast extract at 10 g/L then lithovit at 1.5 g/L in the two seasons except for Fe content.  The best results of both vegetative growth attributes and chemical constituents of leaves were recorded when plants irrigated with magnetized water and sprayed with chitosan at 250 ppm in both seasons. Thus, this treatment could be recommended to improve tomato plants performance under similar conditions of this study.
Keywords
tomato plants; foliar application; Chitosan; Lithovit; selenium; yeast extract; Vegetative growth; Chemical composition
Statistics
Article View: 256
PDF Download: 735
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.