• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
El-Gabiery, A., Ata Allah, Y. (2017). Response of Cotton Plant to Foliar Application with Mepiquat Chloride (Pix) and Kaolin. Journal of Plant Production, 8(10), 1037-1043. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2017.41084
A. E. El-Gabiery; Y. F. A. Ata Allah. "Response of Cotton Plant to Foliar Application with Mepiquat Chloride (Pix) and Kaolin". Journal of Plant Production, 8, 10, 2017, 1037-1043. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2017.41084
El-Gabiery, A., Ata Allah, Y. (2017). 'Response of Cotton Plant to Foliar Application with Mepiquat Chloride (Pix) and Kaolin', Journal of Plant Production, 8(10), pp. 1037-1043. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2017.41084
El-Gabiery, A., Ata Allah, Y. Response of Cotton Plant to Foliar Application with Mepiquat Chloride (Pix) and Kaolin. Journal of Plant Production, 2017; 8(10): 1037-1043. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2017.41084

Response of Cotton Plant to Foliar Application with Mepiquat Chloride (Pix) and Kaolin

Article 11, Volume 8, Issue 10, October 2017, Page 1037-1043  XML PDF (270.88 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2017.41084
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
A. E. El-Gabiery; Y. F. A. Ata Allah
Cotton Physiology Department, Cotton Research Institute
Abstract
One field experiment was carried out on clay soil in 2016 season and repeated in 2017 season in El-Gemmeiza Agricultural Research Station, Agricultural Research Center, El-Gharbiya Governorate, Egypt, to study the effect of seven treatments including foliar application with two rates of mepiquat chloride (pix); 2 and 3cm3/L, two rates of  Kaolin (2 and 3g/L), two rates of mepiquat chloride(pix) and Kaolin application in combination (2cm3+2g)/L, (3cm3+3g)/Lthree times (at squaring stage, at the start of flowering and at the top of flowering) and control treatment on leaf chemical composition, plant growth, earliness, fiber quality and yield of Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.), Giza 86 cultivar. A randomized complete blocks design with 3 replicates was used in both seasons. The important results could be summarized as follow:-  The tested treatments had a significant effect on leaves N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll and carotenoids contents in the two seasons of study, where foliar application with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three times recorded the highest values of these traits in both seasons followed by foliar application with mepiquat chloride alone at 3cm3/L. While, the control treatment produced the lowest values of these traits.Foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three times significantly reduced final plant height, followed by foliar application with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L three times, foliar application with mepiquat chloride at 2cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 2g/L three times, foliar application with mepiquat chloride at 2cm3/L, foliar application with kaolin at 3g/L three times and foliar application with kaolin at 2g/L three times, while control treatment recorded the tallest plants. Number of fruiting branches/plant did not affect by these treatments. Foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three times significantly increased numbers of total flowers and total bolls set/plant, boll setting and earliness percentages followed by foliar application with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L. But, the lowest values were obtained from the control treatment.Foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three times significantly increased boll weight, number of open bolls/plant, seed cotton yield/plant, seed index and seed cotton yield/fed in the two seasons of study followed by foliar application with mepiquat chloride at 3cm3/L. But, untreated plants produced the lowest values.On the other hand, the tested treatments had insignificant effect on fiber quality (fiber strength and micronaire reading) and lint percentage in both seasons.This study demonstrates that foliar spraying with mepiquat chloride (pix) at 3cm3/L in combined with kaolin at 3g/L three times (at squaring stage, at the start of flowering and at the top of flowering) could be recommended to improve the chemical composition of leaves, vegetative growth traits, earliness, yield/feddan, yield components and  fiber quality of Giza 86 cotton cultivar under conditions of El-Gemmeiza location.
Statistics
Article View: 200
PDF Download: 681
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.