• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Mousa, A., Abdelghany, M. (2022). Effect of Planting Methods on the Productivity of some Egyptian Rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Journal of Plant Production, 13(10), 775-781. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2022.152877.1148
A. M. M. Mousa; Mohamed Abdelghany. "Effect of Planting Methods on the Productivity of some Egyptian Rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars". Journal of Plant Production, 13, 10, 2022, 775-781. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2022.152877.1148
Mousa, A., Abdelghany, M. (2022). 'Effect of Planting Methods on the Productivity of some Egyptian Rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars', Journal of Plant Production, 13(10), pp. 775-781. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2022.152877.1148
Mousa, A., Abdelghany, M. Effect of Planting Methods on the Productivity of some Egyptian Rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Journal of Plant Production, 2022; 13(10): 775-781. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2022.152877.1148

Effect of Planting Methods on the Productivity of some Egyptian Rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars

Article 3, Volume 13, Issue 10, October 2022, Page 775-781  XML PDF (1.04 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2022.152877.1148
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
A. M. M. Mousa email 1; Mohamed Abdelghany2
1Rice Research Department, Field Crops Research Institute, ARC, Egypt
2Crop Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Damanhour University, Damanhour 22516, Egypt
Abstract
Two field experiments were carried out in two seasons (2020 and 2021) at Itay El-Baroud Agricultural Research Station, El-Beheira Governorate, Egypt to evaluate three Egyptian rice cultivars (Giza177, Sakha101 and Sakha108) under three planting methods (drilling seeded, regular transplanting and parachute transplanting). Days to heading, plant height, number of productive tillers m-2, panicle length, panicle weight, number of filled grains panicle-1, number of unfilled grains panicle-1 and 1000-grain weight, grain yield, biomass yield, harvest index and production efficiency were measured. There were no significant differences between regular and parachute transplanting methods on plant height, number of productive tillers\ m2 and panicle length whereas the drill planting method recorded the lowest values in both seasons except days to heading showed no significant difference with parachute transplanting. The interaction between planting methods and rice cultivars had a significant effect on the number of days to heading, number of productive tillers m-2 and plant height. There were no significant differences between parachuting and regular transplanting methods in panicle weight, number of filled grains panicle-1 and 1000-grain weight where the parachute transplanting method recorded the highest values followed by regular transplanting in the first season. On contrary, the highest values were given by regular transplanting followed by parachuting in the second season. Also, there were no significant differences between regular and parachute transplanting in 1000-grain weight, grain yield, biomass yield and harvest index. These results revealed that regular and parachute transplanting methods are efficient and farmers can choose between them based on their capabilities.
Keywords
Rice; regular transplanting; parachute transplanting
Statistics
Article View: 191
PDF Download: 393
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.