• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Taha,, M., El-Azab, E., El-Shazly, S., Abdel-Wahed, S. (2000). RESPONSE OF WILLIAMS BANANA PLANTS TO UREA FOLIAR SPRAYS. Journal of Plant Production, 25(4), 2265-2283. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2000.258804
M. W. Taha,; E. M. El-Azab; S. M. El-Shazly; S. M. Abdel-Wahed. "RESPONSE OF WILLIAMS BANANA PLANTS TO UREA FOLIAR SPRAYS". Journal of Plant Production, 25, 4, 2000, 2265-2283. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2000.258804
Taha,, M., El-Azab, E., El-Shazly, S., Abdel-Wahed, S. (2000). 'RESPONSE OF WILLIAMS BANANA PLANTS TO UREA FOLIAR SPRAYS', Journal of Plant Production, 25(4), pp. 2265-2283. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2000.258804
Taha,, M., El-Azab, E., El-Shazly, S., Abdel-Wahed, S. RESPONSE OF WILLIAMS BANANA PLANTS TO UREA FOLIAR SPRAYS. Journal of Plant Production, 2000; 25(4): 2265-2283. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2000.258804

RESPONSE OF WILLIAMS BANANA PLANTS TO UREA FOLIAR SPRAYS

Article 20, Volume 25, Issue 4, April 2000, Page 2265-2283  XML PDF (1.03 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2000.258804
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
M. W. Taha,; E. M. El-Azab; S. M. El-Shazly; S. M. Abdel-Wahed
Pomology Dept., Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University.
Abstract
     The present investigation was carried out during 1996/1997 and 1997/1998 growing seasons on Williams banana plants. All combinations of two, four and six foliar sprays of 0, 1,  2,  3 and 4% urea (i.e. 15 treatments) were used in this experiment. The results revealed that, spraying banana plants with different urea concentrations increased the vegetative growth parameters (pseudostem height, girth, height/girth ratio and number of green leaves) as compared with the control plants (0% urea) in both seasons. The concentration of 2% urea gave the highest pseudostem height, girth and number of green leaves. Meanwhile, it gave the lowest pseudostem height/girth ratio. Increasing the number of urea sprays, generally, increased the growth of banana plants. Increasing the concentration of urea progressively delayed fruit maturity. Likewise, increasing the number of urea sprays significantly delayed maturity in the second season, whereas, fruit maturity was not greatly affected in the first season. The urea application showed a positive effect on yield (as bunch weight), stalk length, and number of hands and fingers per bunch. The maximum increase was associated with the 2% urea. Moreover, increasing the number of urea sprays slightly increased bunch weight and markedly increased other bunch parameters. The application of urea, in general, increased fingers length, weight and girth, pulp and peel weights, pulp/peel ratio, fruit TSS and acidity percentages. The effect was more pronounced with urea at 2%. Increasing urea concentration increased leaf N, K, Mg, Ca and Zn contents, Meanwhile, P, Na, Fe, Mn and Cu were not significantly affected. On the other hand, the number of urea sprays did not show a clear effect.
Statistics
Article View: 87
PDF Download: 228
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.