• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Gamie,, A. (2000). COMPARISON BETWEEN PROGENIES OF SHANDWEEL SINGLE CENTER AND SOME EGYPTIAN ONION CULTIVARS. Journal of Plant Production, 25(4), 1933-1940. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2000.258778
A. A. Gamie,. "COMPARISON BETWEEN PROGENIES OF SHANDWEEL SINGLE CENTER AND SOME EGYPTIAN ONION CULTIVARS". Journal of Plant Production, 25, 4, 2000, 1933-1940. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2000.258778
Gamie,, A. (2000). 'COMPARISON BETWEEN PROGENIES OF SHANDWEEL SINGLE CENTER AND SOME EGYPTIAN ONION CULTIVARS', Journal of Plant Production, 25(4), pp. 1933-1940. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2000.258778
Gamie,, A. COMPARISON BETWEEN PROGENIES OF SHANDWEEL SINGLE CENTER AND SOME EGYPTIAN ONION CULTIVARS. Journal of Plant Production, 2000; 25(4): 1933-1940. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2000.258778

COMPARISON BETWEEN PROGENIES OF SHANDWEEL SINGLE CENTER AND SOME EGYPTIAN ONION CULTIVARS

Article 5, Volume 25, Issue 4, April 2000, Page 1933-1940  XML PDF (577.67 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2000.258778
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
A. A. Gamie,
Onion Research Section, Field Crops Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center.
Abstract
 
                This work was carried out at Shandweel Experimental  Station, Sohag Governrate during the period from 1995 to 1998 to compare of Shandweel single center progenies with Shandweel-1, Giza 6 Mohassan and Giza 20 for some bulb characteristics. The mean results could be summarized as followed :
1- Percentages of single center bulbs, internal and external doubles, total and culls yield, average bulb weight, percentage of internal doubling at the end of the storage period 6 months were significantly decreased in the progenies of the parent bulbs with single growing point compared with local Egyptian cultivars .
2- Percentages of single growing point for freshly harvested bulbs and single growing point remained as such though at the end of storage period which gave the highest significant increase with progeny of single growing point bulbs.
3- Percentage of single center bulbs was significantly increased with progeny of internal doubles bulbs of the freshly harvested bulbs, while, it gave the highest value with progeny of single center bulbs at the end of the storage period in comprasion with the Shandweel-1, Giza 6 Mohassan and Giza 20 Egyptian cultivars .
4- Total onion yield markedly improve using the Giza 20 ranked by Shandweel 1, Giza 6 Mohassan, compared with the rest of Shandweel S. C. progeny .
Statistics
Article View: 64
PDF Download: 225
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.