• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Galal,, A., Amer, E., EI-Shenawy, A. (2002). COMPARISON AMONG THE FOUR METHODS OF GRIFFING (1956) IN COMPLETE DIALLEL SET OF MAIZE INBRED. Journal of Plant Production, 27(2), 733-737. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2002.253316
A. A. Galal,; E. A. Amer; A. A. EI-Shenawy. "COMPARISON AMONG THE FOUR METHODS OF GRIFFING (1956) IN COMPLETE DIALLEL SET OF MAIZE INBRED". Journal of Plant Production, 27, 2, 2002, 733-737. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2002.253316
Galal,, A., Amer, E., EI-Shenawy, A. (2002). 'COMPARISON AMONG THE FOUR METHODS OF GRIFFING (1956) IN COMPLETE DIALLEL SET OF MAIZE INBRED', Journal of Plant Production, 27(2), pp. 733-737. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2002.253316
Galal,, A., Amer, E., EI-Shenawy, A. COMPARISON AMONG THE FOUR METHODS OF GRIFFING (1956) IN COMPLETE DIALLEL SET OF MAIZE INBRED. Journal of Plant Production, 2002; 27(2): 733-737. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2002.253316

COMPARISON AMONG THE FOUR METHODS OF GRIFFING (1956) IN COMPLETE DIALLEL SET OF MAIZE INBRED

Article 4, Volume 27, Issue 2, February 2002, Page 733-737  XML PDF (1.86 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2002.253316
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
A. A. Galal,; E. A. Amer; A. A. EI-Shenawy
Field Crops Research Institute, Agric. Res. Center.
Abstract
Complete diallel set of 7 inbred, 21 single crosses and 21 reciprocal
crosses were used for this study. The four methods of Griffing 1956
computed to obtain general combaining ability (G.C.A),spicific combining
ability (S.C.A) and reciprocal effects for six characters. Grain yield
(ard/fed), silking date, plant height, ear height, resistance to late wilt and
resistance to downy mildew diseases were recorded. Generally, the results
based on mean (x), coefficient of variability (C.V) experimental error (cr2e)
and appropriate G.C.AlS.C.A mean square ratio emphasized that method
- 4 was suitable in the case of diallel study for all studied traits, while the
results optioned depending on including G.C.AlS.C.A ratio revealed that
method -3 including single crosses and their reciprocal gave similar results
with respect to gene action
Statistics
Article View: 66
PDF Download: 255
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.