• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Moustafa,, M. (2002). GENE EFFECT FOR YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENT FOR FOUR DURUM WHEAT CROSSES.. Journal of Plant Production, 27(1), 47-60. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2002.247815
M. A. Moustafa,. "GENE EFFECT FOR YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENT FOR FOUR DURUM WHEAT CROSSES.". Journal of Plant Production, 27, 1, 2002, 47-60. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2002.247815
Moustafa,, M. (2002). 'GENE EFFECT FOR YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENT FOR FOUR DURUM WHEAT CROSSES.', Journal of Plant Production, 27(1), pp. 47-60. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2002.247815
Moustafa,, M. GENE EFFECT FOR YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENT FOR FOUR DURUM WHEAT CROSSES.. Journal of Plant Production, 2002; 27(1): 47-60. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2002.247815

GENE EFFECT FOR YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENT FOR FOUR DURUM WHEAT CROSSES.

Article 5, Volume 27, Issue 1, January 2002, Page 47-60  XML PDF (722.39 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2002.247815
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
M. A. Moustafa,
Wheat Research Program, Field Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center
Abstract
Four experiments were carried out with two intervarietal crosses:
1 ( Beni Sweif 1 x Line 13)
2 (Sohag x Line 21)
3 (Line 9 x Line 14)
4( Line 10 x Line 21. Six populations of each cross were used in this investigation).
                Significant positive heterotic effects were obtained for plant height, number of number of spikelets /spike, spike grain weight,1000-grain weight and grain yield/plant in the first cross; for plant height, number of grains/ spike, spike grain weight and 1000 – grain weight in the third cross; for spikes/plant and spike length in the second cross. However, significant negative heterotic effects were found for spike grain weight, 1000 – grain weight and grain yield / plant in the second cross; for spike length and number of spikelets /spike and grain yield / plant in the third cross; for number of spikes/ plant, number of spikelets/spike, number of grains/ spike, spike grain weight, 1000- grain weight and grain yield/ plant in the fourth cross. Hetevolic increase in number of spikelets/spike grain weight and 1000 – grain weight seemed to be accounted for the heterotic yield response observed in the first cross.
                Inbreeding depression estimates were found to be significant for all the studied attributes except spike length and number of spikeletes/spike in the first and second crosses; for number of grains/ spike and 1000 – grain weight in the first cross; for plant height, spike length and number of grains/ spike in the third cross.
                Over dominance to wards the higher parent for spike grain weight and 1000 – grain weight in the first and third crosses; for number of spikelets/ spike in the first cross and for number of grains/ spike in the third cross. However, over and partial dominance towards the lower parent was obtained for plant height, number of spikes/ plant and spike length in the first and third crosses; for spike grain weight and 1000 – grain weight in the second cross; for number of spikes/ plant, number of grains / spike and grain weight in the third cross. While, partial dominance was obtained for number of grains / spike and grain yield / plant in the first cross; for plant height, spike length, number of spikelets / spike, number of grains / spike and grain yield / plant in the second cross; for number . of spikelets / spike in the third cross and for plant height, number of spikelets / spike and 1000 – grain in the fourth cross. However, Complete dominance was found for number of spikes / plant in the second cross and for spike length and grain yield / plant in the fourth cross.
                F2 deviation (E1) and back cross deviation were found to be signifcant for most of the attributes under investigation.
                The additive gene effect were found to be significant for all traits in all cross except for plant height in the first cross and for spike length and number of spikelets / spike in the second cross. Suggesting the potential for obtaining further improvements of most characters studied. Both dominance and epistasis were found to be significant for most of the attributes under investigation.
                High to moderate values of heritability estimates were found to be associated with high and moderate genetic advance as percentage of F2 mean in most traits investigated.
Statistics
Article View: 69
PDF Download: 221
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.