Farghaly,, B. (2003). EVALL!ATION OF INTERCROPPING SUGAR BEE AND SUGAR CANE AND IT'S EFFECT ON GROWTH, YIELID AND JUICE QUALITY.. Journal of Plant Production, 28(3), 1567-1577. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2003.242478
B. S. Farghaly,. "EVALL!ATION OF INTERCROPPING SUGAR BEE AND SUGAR CANE AND IT'S EFFECT ON GROWTH, YIELID AND JUICE QUALITY.". Journal of Plant Production, 28, 3, 2003, 1567-1577. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2003.242478
Farghaly,, B. (2003). 'EVALL!ATION OF INTERCROPPING SUGAR BEE AND SUGAR CANE AND IT'S EFFECT ON GROWTH, YIELID AND JUICE QUALITY.', Journal of Plant Production, 28(3), pp. 1567-1577. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2003.242478
Farghaly,, B. EVALL!ATION OF INTERCROPPING SUGAR BEE AND SUGAR CANE AND IT'S EFFECT ON GROWTH, YIELID AND JUICE QUALITY.. Journal of Plant Production, 2003; 28(3): 1567-1577. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2003.242478
EVALL!ATION OF INTERCROPPING SUGAR BEE AND SUGAR CANE AND IT'S EFFECT ON GROWTH, YIELID AND JUICE QUALITY.
Two field experiments were conducted at Shandaweel experimental station, Sohag governorate, upper Egypt during 2000 I 2001 and 2001 12002 seasons to study effect of intercropplng sugar beet and sugar cane. Sugar beet was planted with one row on the ridge of sugar cane under different plant densities of sugar beet. Each experiment included fIVe treetments; 3 treatments lor distances of sugar beet at 20, 25 and 30 em among the hills and :2 treatments for pure stand of sugar pure stand of beet. Randomized complete block design was used In the experiment i.vlth four replication pial Brea was 25 m2• The main resulls could be summarized as follows:
Sugar cane yield was decreased from intercropping with sugar ~eet and lowest value was obtained from planting sugar beet at 20cm betwee~ hills.
Brix degree. sucrose. purity, rendement and sugar yield were unaffec ed by Inlercropping In both seasons.
Pure stand of sugar beet had higher top and root yieldslf d Than intercropped sugar beet.
Sugar beet quality characters were decreased by intercropping except total soluble solids (T.S.S %), was increased by intercr'opping in both seasons.
Intercropplng sugar beet with sugar cane increased land usage b 48.5 to 64 %.
The relative crowding coefficient fO( both crops was increased by increasing distance between hills of sugar beet.
The economical analysis clearly showed that intercropping sugar eet with sugar cane gave the highest gross profit comparing with sole cropped treatments. Moreover. the results indicated that the best treatment was when the interc:ropped sugar beet was sown at distance of 30 cm between1hills.
It could be recommended that planting one row of sugar beet at a distance of 30 cm between hills on cane ridges is successful and profitable for production under conditions 01 Upper Egypt.