• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
EI-Metwally,, J., Saad EI·Din, S. (2003). RESPONSE OF PEA (Pisum sativum, L,) PLANTS TO SOME WEED CONTROL TREATMENTS. Journal of Plant Production, 28(2), 947-969. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2003.242444
J. M. EI-Metwally,; Samia A. Saad EI·Din. "RESPONSE OF PEA (Pisum sativum, L,) PLANTS TO SOME WEED CONTROL TREATMENTS". Journal of Plant Production, 28, 2, 2003, 947-969. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2003.242444
EI-Metwally,, J., Saad EI·Din, S. (2003). 'RESPONSE OF PEA (Pisum sativum, L,) PLANTS TO SOME WEED CONTROL TREATMENTS', Journal of Plant Production, 28(2), pp. 947-969. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2003.242444
EI-Metwally,, J., Saad EI·Din, S. RESPONSE OF PEA (Pisum sativum, L,) PLANTS TO SOME WEED CONTROL TREATMENTS. Journal of Plant Production, 2003; 28(2): 947-969. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2003.242444

RESPONSE OF PEA (Pisum sativum, L,) PLANTS TO SOME WEED CONTROL TREATMENTS

Article 15, Volume 28, Issue 2, February 2003, Page 947-969  XML PDF (15.04 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2003.242444
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
J. M. EI-Metwally,; Samia A. Saad EI·Din
Botany Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo,
Abstract
Two field experiments were carried out in the Experimental Farm of the
National Research Centre at Shalakan, Kalubia Govemorate, Egypt in the winter
seasons of 200012001 and 2001/2002. The objective of the experiments was to
investigate the effect of some weed control treatments (i.e. A. Early pre-planting :
Paraquat and hand hoeing, B. After planting: Butralin, Bentazon, Fluazifop-butyl,
SWalln + Bentazon, Butralin + Fluazifop-bl.1y1. 8entazon + fluazifop-butyl and one
hand hoeing) on growth, yield and yield components as well as chemical composition
and associated weeds of pea plants c:.J. Master 8. The most important results
obtaine.d from this study could be summarized as follows:
All weed control treatments significantly decreased fresh and dry weight of
broad-leaved, grasses and total weeds after 50 and 70 days from sowing. Hand
hoeing as early pre-planting weed control treatment gave the best control of broad-
leaved, grasses and total weeds of both seasons. Also, hand hoeing as after planting
weed control treatment recorded the highest decrease in fresh and dry weight of
broad-leaved and total weeds of both seasons. While, Fluazifop-butyl as after planting
weed control treatment recorded the lowest fresh and dry weight of grass weeds of
both seasons.
Hand hoeing as early pre-planting caused a signifICant increase in plant
height after 50 and 70 days from sowing, pod length, fresh weight of pod, number of
green pods/plant. weight of 100 green seeds, yield of green pods/plant, pod yield
(tonlfed) and chemical composition of pea seed in both seasons as compared with
both treatments. Whereas, Paraquat as early pre-planting treatment gave the highest
values of number of leaves/plant, fresh and dry weight of plant after 50 and 70 days
from sowing' and number of green seeds/pod when compared with hand hoeing and
unweeded treatments.
After planting treatments had significant effect on growth, yield and yield
components as well as chemical composition of pea seeds in both seasons. Hand
hoeing followed by that of Bentazon + Fluazifop-butyl as after planting exceeded other
treatments.
The interaction between early pre-p/anling and after planting weed control
treatments had significant effect on some studied traits. Using hand hoeing as early
pre-planting and hand hoeing as after planting Ireatments produced the lowest fresh
and dry w.eight of total weeds after 50 and 70 days from sowing in both seasons as
well as produced the highest plant height and pod yield (ton/fed) of pea in both
seasons followed by that of using Paraquat as earty pre-planting and Bentazon +
Fluazifop-butyl as after planting weed control trealments as compared with other
treatments. While. application of Paraquat as early pre-planting and hand hoeing as
after planting treatment produced the highest number of green pods/plant in both
seasons.
Keywords
pea; early pre-planting. after planting; hand hoeing. Paraquat; 8utralin; Bentazon; Fluazifop-butyl; unweeded
Statistics
Article View: 64
PDF Download: 417
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.