Home Articles List Article Information
Journal of Plant Production
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
EI-Kazzaz,, M., EI-Zahaby, H., Badr, M., Gouda, M. (2003). UTILIZATION OF CERTAIN BIOCONTROL AGENTS AGAINST SUGAR BEET DAMPING-OFF AND ROOT ROT DISEASES. Journal of Plant Production, 28(1), 371-378. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2003.241877
M. K. EI-Kazzaz,; H. M. EI-Zahaby; M. M. Badr; M. I. Gouda. "UTILIZATION OF CERTAIN BIOCONTROL AGENTS AGAINST SUGAR BEET DAMPING-OFF AND ROOT ROT DISEASES". Journal of Plant Production, 28, 1, 2003, 371-378. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2003.241877
EI-Kazzaz,, M., EI-Zahaby, H., Badr, M., Gouda, M. (2003). 'UTILIZATION OF CERTAIN BIOCONTROL AGENTS AGAINST SUGAR BEET DAMPING-OFF AND ROOT ROT DISEASES', Journal of Plant Production, 28(1), pp. 371-378. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2003.241877
EI-Kazzaz,, M., EI-Zahaby, H., Badr, M., Gouda, M. UTILIZATION OF CERTAIN BIOCONTROL AGENTS AGAINST SUGAR BEET DAMPING-OFF AND ROOT ROT DISEASES. Journal of Plant Production, 2003; 28(1): 371-378. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2003.241877

UTILIZATION OF CERTAIN BIOCONTROL AGENTS AGAINST SUGAR BEET DAMPING-OFF AND ROOT ROT DISEASES

Article 18, Volume 28, Issue 1, January 2003, Page 371-378  XML PDF (2.6 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2003.241877
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
M. K. EI-Kazzaz,1; H. M. EI-Zahaby2; M. M. Badr3; M. I. Gouda4
1Agricultural Botany Department, Fac. of Agric., Kafr EI-5heikh, Tanta Univ., Egypt,
2Agricultural Botany Department, Fac. of Agric. at Tanta, Tanta Univ., Egypt,
3Agricultural Botany Department, Fac. of Agric., Kafr EI-5heikh, Tanta Univ., Egypt,
4Plant Pathol. Research Institute, ARC, Giza, Egypt.
Abstract
Some fungal and bacterial bioagents as well as an actinomycte isolate were
screened for their antagonistic effects against Sclerotium rolfsii, Rhizoctonia solani,
Macrophomina phaseolina, Fusarium oxysporum, and Fusarium solani in vitro.
Trichoderma hamatum, T. harzianum, and T. pseudokoningii, as well as certain isolats
of Bacillus subtilis and one isolate of Pseudomonas f1uorscens were the most effective
bioagents in suppressing the radial growth of the four patboqens. Yet, they were less
effective in retarding growth of Fusarium spp. as compared with the other pathogens
under study.
T. hamatum, T. harzaium, P. f1uorescense and B. subtilis under greenhouse
(S. rolfsii-infested soil) and field (natural infection) conditions may be utilized to
biological control of sugar beet damping-off and root rot diseases.
Three different formulae, suspension, powder, and granules were prepared from T.
hamatum, B. subtilis and Actinomyces isolate, to be utilized in field application. The
most effective bioagent for controlling the seedling blight was Rhizo-N followed by the
suspension of B. subtilis which exhibited the least percentage of seedling blight. While
the least affective one was Plantguard the granules of Actinomyces, and B. subtilis.
For controlling the root-rot diseases, the most effective bioagent was T. hamatum
(powder), while B. subtilis (suspension or granules) and Actinomyces (granules) were
the least effective bioagents in this respect. These treatments also caused an
        increase in root yield per plot.                                                .
Keywords
Biocontrol agents. damping-off; sugar beet; and root rot diseases
Statistics
Article View: 77
PDF Download: 289