• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Ibrahim,, M., Motawei, A. (2004). COMBINING ABILITY OF NEW MAIZE INBRED LINES BY LINE x TESTER ANALYSIS. Journal of Plant Production, 29(8), 4349-4356. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2004.238779
M. H.A. Ibrahim,; A. A. Motawei. "COMBINING ABILITY OF NEW MAIZE INBRED LINES BY LINE x TESTER ANALYSIS". Journal of Plant Production, 29, 8, 2004, 4349-4356. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2004.238779
Ibrahim,, M., Motawei, A. (2004). 'COMBINING ABILITY OF NEW MAIZE INBRED LINES BY LINE x TESTER ANALYSIS', Journal of Plant Production, 29(8), pp. 4349-4356. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2004.238779
Ibrahim,, M., Motawei, A. COMBINING ABILITY OF NEW MAIZE INBRED LINES BY LINE x TESTER ANALYSIS. Journal of Plant Production, 2004; 29(8): 4349-4356. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2004.238779

COMBINING ABILITY OF NEW MAIZE INBRED LINES BY LINE x TESTER ANALYSIS

Article 1, Volume 29, Issue 8, August 2004, Page 4349-4356  XML PDF (2.61 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2004.238779
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
M. H.A. Ibrahim,; A. A. Motawei
Maize Research Section, FCRI , Sakha ARS , ARC, Egypt
Abstract
Fourteen inbred lines were top-crossed to three testers, i.e. SK-7001/8,
SCSK-17 and Gz-2 at Sakha in 2002 season. The top-crosses were evaluated in
2003 at Sakha and Gemmeiza locations. Significant differences were detected
between two locations for all the studied traits. Mean squares of crosses and their
partitioning into lines and testers were significant for all studied traits except for ear
diameter for lines and testers. Moreover, mean squares due to lines x testers
interaction were highly significant for grain yield, plant height. While, it was significant
for ear length, ear height and weight of 1 ~O-grains.
The best desirable GCA effects for grain and most yield components were
obtained by inbred lines SK-63-32 and SK-58-30. Also, the inbred lines SK-62-11, SK-
62-12 and Sk-62-13 showed the best GCA effects for silking date, plant and ear
height towards earliness and short plants, respectively. The inbred tester SK-7001/8
showed the best desirable GCA effects for number of rows/ear.
Moreover, the tester SCSK-17 was the best combiner for grain yield and
number of kernels/row. While, the tester Gz-2 was the best general combiner for
earliness and short plants. Two top crosses SK-63-32 x SK-7001/8 and SK-63-32 x
SCSK-17 did not differ significantly from the check variety SC1O. Moreover, fourteen
top crosses exhibited significant differences than check variety TWC310. Also, most
of the remainder top crosses did not differ significantly from the last check (fWC 310).
These crosses can be used in maize breeding program.
The additive genetic variance was more important for grain yield, weight of
1 DO-grain, plant height and ear height. While, non-additive genetic variance was an
important for number of kernels/row, ear diameter and silking date. Moreover, non-
additive genetic variance was more affected interacted by locations than additive
genetic variance for all studied traits except number of kernelslrow and ear diameter.
Keywords
Maize; Zea mays L; line x tester; combining ability; top crosses
Statistics
Article View: 96
PDF Download: 255
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.