• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
El-Shennawy,, O., El- Mokadem, H. (2005). CYCOCEL AFFECTS VEGETATIVE GROWTH AND KEEPING QUALtTY 0F Moiuccefla Iaevr's L.. Journal of Plant Production, 30(6), 3319-3330. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2005.237248
Ola A. El-Shennawy,; Hoda E. El- Mokadem. "CYCOCEL AFFECTS VEGETATIVE GROWTH AND KEEPING QUALtTY 0F Moiuccefla Iaevr's L.". Journal of Plant Production, 30, 6, 2005, 3319-3330. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2005.237248
El-Shennawy,, O., El- Mokadem, H. (2005). 'CYCOCEL AFFECTS VEGETATIVE GROWTH AND KEEPING QUALtTY 0F Moiuccefla Iaevr's L.', Journal of Plant Production, 30(6), pp. 3319-3330. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2005.237248
El-Shennawy,, O., El- Mokadem, H. CYCOCEL AFFECTS VEGETATIVE GROWTH AND KEEPING QUALtTY 0F Moiuccefla Iaevr's L.. Journal of Plant Production, 2005; 30(6): 3319-3330. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2005.237248

CYCOCEL AFFECTS VEGETATIVE GROWTH AND KEEPING QUALtTY 0F Moiuccefla Iaevr's L.

Article 11, Volume 30, Issue 6, June 2005, Page 3319-3330  XML PDF (520.21 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2005.237248
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Ola A. El-Shennawy,; Hoda E. El- Mokadem
Dept. of Floriculture. Ornamental Horticulture and Garden Design, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Abstract
Two experiments were conducted in the Floriculture and Ornamental
Horticulture Research Garden, at El-Shatby. during the seasons of 20002002 and
200212003, to study the effect of cycocel 0n the vegetative growth and the keeping
quality of a local cultivar of Mofucceffa faevr's L. plants. Each experiment included two
application methods of Cycocel, as a foliar spray or as a soil drench, using the rates
at 0.500100020003000 and 4000 ppm. Generally. all cycocel treatments were
significantly effective in controlling the plant height. compared with the control, but the
effect of the soil drench was significantly more than that of the foliar spray in reducing
the plant height. The minimum plant height was recorded at the highest cycocel
concentration of the soil drench {4000 ppm) followed by the same concentration of
foliar spray in the first and second seasons respectively. The control plants
significantly had the maxrmum mean of the leaf area. compared with cycoc‘el treated
plants. The leaf area decreased with increasing cycocel concentrations. Cycocel
significantly decreased the shoot dry weight, compared with the control. The lowest
mean was recorded at the highest cycocel concentration applied as a soil drench.
The leaf chlorophyll contents were significantly increased in the treated plants,
compared with the untreated ones in both application methods. Cycocel significantly
increased the vase life compared with the control. The maximum vase tife (12.8, 12.2
days) were recorded by the treatments at (4000 ppm) as foliar spray followed by the
treatment of the same concentration as soil drench in the first and second seasons
respectively. Water uptake of plants were improved by all cycocel treatments.
however, the differences among treatments were not significant. The maximum water
uptake was obtained by the treatments of 3000 ppm followed by 2000 ppm cycocel
as foliar spray. in the first and second seasons respectively.
Statistics
Article View: 60
PDF Download: 226
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.