• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Gaser,, A. (2007). IMPACT OF SOME ROOTSTOCKS ON PERFORMANCE OF SUPERIOR GRAPE CULTIVAR. Journal of Plant Production, 32(11), 9347-9375. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2007.221155
Aisha S. A. Gaser,. "IMPACT OF SOME ROOTSTOCKS ON PERFORMANCE OF SUPERIOR GRAPE CULTIVAR". Journal of Plant Production, 32, 11, 2007, 9347-9375. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2007.221155
Gaser,, A. (2007). 'IMPACT OF SOME ROOTSTOCKS ON PERFORMANCE OF SUPERIOR GRAPE CULTIVAR', Journal of Plant Production, 32(11), pp. 9347-9375. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2007.221155
Gaser,, A. IMPACT OF SOME ROOTSTOCKS ON PERFORMANCE OF SUPERIOR GRAPE CULTIVAR. Journal of Plant Production, 2007; 32(11): 9347-9375. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2007.221155

IMPACT OF SOME ROOTSTOCKS ON PERFORMANCE OF SUPERIOR GRAPE CULTIVAR

Article 15, Volume 32, Issue 11, November 2007, Page 9347-9375  XML PDF (553.59 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2007.221155
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Aisha S. A. Gaser,
Viticulture Res. Dept., Hort. Res. Inst., Agric. Res. Center, Giza
Abstract
The present investigation was conducted during the period from 2001 to 2006, to study the influence of some grape rootstocks on Superior cultivar. Two stages were involved in this study; the first included bench grafting of Superior cultivar on Dogridge, Salt creek, Freedom, Harmony, SO4, Teleki 5C, Paulsen 1103 rootstocks. The following determinations were carried out: percentage of grafting success, vegetative growth of shoots and roots, fresh and dry weight, relative water content, chlorophyll and cation exchange capacity as compared to own-rooted plants. The second stage included the performance of Superior on different rootstocks to study their influence on yield, physical characteristics of bunch & berries, TSS & acidity and morphological characteristics of vegetative growth, coefficient of wood ripening, weight of prunings, trunk volume, leaf content of mineral elements, cane content of total carbohydrates and coefficient of bud fertility.
The results showed that the percentage of grafting success was around (66.7-86.5%) according to rootstocks in all seasons. All rootstocks under study increased the vegetative growth, root length, fresh and dry weight, relative water content, chlorophyll and cation exchange capacity in grafted plants as compared to own-rooted ones. The increase in yield and improvement of grapes in grafted vines ranged between (14.2–36.8%) as compared with those of own-rooted plants according to rootstocks and seasons. Moreover, all rootstocks under study improved the characteristics of vegetative growth, coefficient of wood ripening, weight of prunings, trunk volume, leaf content of mineral elements, cane content of total carbohydrates and coefficient of bud fertility especially Dogridge, Salt creek, Paulsen 1103 and Freedom rootstocks compared to non grafted vines.
Statistics
Article View: 185
PDF Download: 350
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.