• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Kandil, A., HobAllah, A., Khalil, N., Taha, M. (2007). CANOLA YIELD FORMATION UNDER DIFFERENT SEEDING METHODS AND SEEDING RATES. Journal of Plant Production, 32(2), 857-871. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2007.204896
A. A. Kandil; A. A. HobAllah; N. A. Khalil; M. H. Taha. "CANOLA YIELD FORMATION UNDER DIFFERENT SEEDING METHODS AND SEEDING RATES". Journal of Plant Production, 32, 2, 2007, 857-871. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2007.204896
Kandil, A., HobAllah, A., Khalil, N., Taha, M. (2007). 'CANOLA YIELD FORMATION UNDER DIFFERENT SEEDING METHODS AND SEEDING RATES', Journal of Plant Production, 32(2), pp. 857-871. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2007.204896
Kandil, A., HobAllah, A., Khalil, N., Taha, M. CANOLA YIELD FORMATION UNDER DIFFERENT SEEDING METHODS AND SEEDING RATES. Journal of Plant Production, 2007; 32(2): 857-871. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2007.204896

CANOLA YIELD FORMATION UNDER DIFFERENT SEEDING METHODS AND SEEDING RATES

Article 7, Volume 32, Issue 2, February 2007, Page 857-871  XML PDF (944.21 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2007.204896
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
A. A. Kandil; A. A. HobAllah; N. A. Khalil; M. H. Taha
Agronomy Department, Fac. of Agric, Cairo University, Giza
Abstract
The aim of the present investigation was to study the effect of seeding methods and seeding rates on yielding ability and yield structure of Brassica napus and Brassica campestris (canola). For this purpose, four separate field experiments were conducted at the Agricultural Experiment and Research Center, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University during 2002/2003 and 2003/2004 winter seasons. The experiments were carried out in a split plot design with 4 replications. The main plots were randomly distributed by three seeding methods (broadcasting, drilling in rows 25 cm and 50 cm apart). The sub-plots were devoted to three seeding rates of 1, 2 and 3Kg/fad at each seeding method. Of the main effects on both species, combined data over the two seasons revealed that seeding methods had significant effect on seed yield/fad as well as yield/plant(g) and its contributing traits with some exceptions, while seeding rate effects were only significant for yield/plant(g) and its components in addition to seed oil% of B. campestris only. Considering the interaction between the two factors of study, seeding method appeared to be the major one affecting the canola productivity under the present conditions. Drill seeding of both species either in 25 or 50 cm row spacing at any seeding rate produced higher yield/fad than the broadcasting. Numerically highest yield/fad of both species was produced from drilling at 25 cm row spacing combined with 3 Kg/fad seeding rate. Seed yield/plant(g) and all of its components were significantly affected by the interaction. Yield/plant(g) and siliquae/plant as well as yield and siliquae per main, primary and secondary branches in addition to seed index exhibited linear decrease as seeding rates increased, and this was true for almost all seeding methods. High values of these traits were recorded at lower (1 Kg/fad) seeding rate at any seeding method. The interaction had no significant effect on seed oil % for both species. Yield analysis of individual plant showed that the differences in total yield contribution from the main and lateral branches were mostly due to the species. Brassica. napus plants carrying on average more than 90% of total yield/plant(g) on the main and primary branches, while the contribution of secondary branches varied from 0.01 to 9.4% taking into account seeding methods and rates. In contrast, the contribution of secondary branches of B. campestris accounted for 43.5% as a general mean over the two factors of study. The results overall suggest that drill seeding at 25 cm row spacing combined with seeding rate of 3 Kg/fad should be used for production of both B. napus and B. campestris canola.
Statistics
Article View: 93
PDF Download: 311
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.