• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Ibrahim, K., Said, A., Kamara, M. (2021). Evaluation and Classification of Yellow Maize Inbred Lines Using Line X Tester Analysis Across Two Locations. Journal of Plant Production, 12(6), 605-613. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2021.77256.1030
Kh. A. M. Ibrahim; A. A. Said; M. M. Kamara. "Evaluation and Classification of Yellow Maize Inbred Lines Using Line X Tester Analysis Across Two Locations". Journal of Plant Production, 12, 6, 2021, 605-613. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2021.77256.1030
Ibrahim, K., Said, A., Kamara, M. (2021). 'Evaluation and Classification of Yellow Maize Inbred Lines Using Line X Tester Analysis Across Two Locations', Journal of Plant Production, 12(6), pp. 605-613. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2021.77256.1030
Ibrahim, K., Said, A., Kamara, M. Evaluation and Classification of Yellow Maize Inbred Lines Using Line X Tester Analysis Across Two Locations. Journal of Plant Production, 2021; 12(6): 605-613. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2021.77256.1030

Evaluation and Classification of Yellow Maize Inbred Lines Using Line X Tester Analysis Across Two Locations

Article 3, Volume 12, Issue 6, June 2021, Page 605-613  XML PDF (845.17 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2021.77256.1030
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Kh. A. M. Ibrahim1; A. A. Said email 2; M. M. Kamara3
1Agronomy Department, Faculty of Agriculture, New Valley University, El-Kharga 72511, Egypt.
2Agronomy department, Faculty of Agriculture, Sohag University
3Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh 33516, Egypt.
Abstract
Ten yellow maize inbred lines and three testers were top crossed in line × tester scheme in 2019 season. The resulted 30 top crosses with two check hybrids were evaluated at two locations in 2020 growing season to assess mean performance, general and specific combining ability and their interaction with locations as well as elucidate type of gene action. The recorded data were days to 50% silking, plant height, ear height, ear length, ear diameter, No. of rows/ear, No. of kernels/row and grain yield (ardab/fed). The results showed that, the mean squares due to locations (Loc), genotypes (G), crosses (Cr.), G × Loc and Cr. × Loc interactions were significant for all the studied traits. Highly significant differences were observed among the evaluated lines (L), testers (T) and its corresponding hybrids for all traits. non-additive gene action gave an important role in the inheritance of all the studied traits. The inbred lines L2, L4 and L6 showed the best desirable GCA effects for earliness, L6, L7 and L10 for shortness and L4, L5, L6, L7 and L9 for lower ear placement.  Whereas the inbreeds L3, L6 and L7 were the best general combiners for grain yield. The crosses L2×T1, L8×T1, L1×T2, L7×T2, L3×T3, L6×T3 and L10×T3 had the best SCA effects for grain yield. The ten inbred lines were classified into three different heterotic groups using HSGCA method. These groups could be used for selecting the best parents for making crosses in maize breeding programs.
Keywords
Maize; Locations; Combining ability; heterotic group; Gene action
Statistics
Article View: 357
PDF Download: 533
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.