• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Ismail, A., Fakkar, A., Hamam, K. (2008). EFFECT OF SOWING METHODS AND WEED CONTROL TREATMENTS ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF WHEAT. Journal of Plant Production, 33(3), 1799-1809. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2008.164679
A. E. A. Ismail; A. A. O. Fakkar; K. A. Hamam. "EFFECT OF SOWING METHODS AND WEED CONTROL TREATMENTS ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF WHEAT". Journal of Plant Production, 33, 3, 2008, 1799-1809. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2008.164679
Ismail, A., Fakkar, A., Hamam, K. (2008). 'EFFECT OF SOWING METHODS AND WEED CONTROL TREATMENTS ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF WHEAT', Journal of Plant Production, 33(3), pp. 1799-1809. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2008.164679
Ismail, A., Fakkar, A., Hamam, K. EFFECT OF SOWING METHODS AND WEED CONTROL TREATMENTS ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF WHEAT. Journal of Plant Production, 2008; 33(3): 1799-1809. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2008.164679

EFFECT OF SOWING METHODS AND WEED CONTROL TREATMENTS ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF WHEAT

Article 10, Volume 33, Issue 3, March 2008, Page 1799-1809  XML PDF (569.15 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2008.164679
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
A. E. A. Ismail1; A. A. O. Fakkar1; K. A. Hamam2
1Weed Res. Lab, Agric. Res. Center, Giza, Egypt
2Agronomy Dept., Fac. Agric., Sohag Univ., Sohag, Egypt
Abstract
Two field experiments were conducted during 2004/05 and 2005/06 seasons at Shandaweel agriculture research station, Sohag governorate, Egypt to study the effect of four sowing methods (broadcasting, afir drilling, Herati and Afir in ridges) and three weed control treatments (Brominal & Topik herbicide, hand weeding and unweeeded control) on growth, yield and yield components of wheat cultivar Giza 168. Split plot design with three replications was used. The results indicated that sowing methods had no significant affects on dry weight of annual weeds in both seasons except narrow and total weeds in second season.Herati and Afir drill methods reduced dry weight of narrow and total weeds by 27.6, 24.9, 25.8 and 20.0 %, respectively in second season, as compared toAfir broadcast method. Weed control treatments had significant affect on dry weight of annual weeds in both seasons, as compared to weedy check. Hand weeding twice andBrominal + Topik reduced dry weight of annual broad, narrow and total weeds by (92.9 &94.8), (91.4 & 93.1) and (93.0 & 91.9%), respectively in the first season and by (99.3 &97.4), (98.8 & 99.2) and (98.9 & 98.7%),, respectively in second season, compared to untreated treatment. Sowing methods had no significant influence onyield and its componentinboth seasons exceptplant height, spike length and straw yield (ton/fed.) in second season and number of spikes/m2 and grain yield (ard./fed) in both seasons. For grain yield (ard./fed), the highest values were obtained from Herati  method by 11.3 and 14.2 ard./fed  compared with Afir broadcast and Afir in ridges methods by 6.8 and 7.0 ard./fed, respectively, in both seasons. All weed control treatments exerted a significant influence on yield and its componentinboth seasons except spike length and grain weight/ spike in second season. The highest values of wheat grain yield (ard/fed) was from application hand weeding twice and Brominal plus Topik by 11.4, 10.3, 12.1 and 11.7 ard./fed. compared with weedy check (6.5 and 7.7 ard/fed), respectively, in both seasons. All interactionsbetween sowing methods and weed control treatments had no significant effects on all studied charactersinboth seasons except dry weight of narrow and total weeds (g/m2) in second season, number of spikes/m2 in both seasons and wheat grain yield (ard/fed) in first season. From this investigation can concluded that using herati or afir drill sowing methods with hand weeding or brominal +Topik gave the highest reduction of weeds and increase wheat grain yield.     
Statistics
Article View: 106
PDF Download: 495
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.