orty eight isolates of Rhizoctonia solani were obtained from flax seedlings showed seedling blight. Anastmosis tests revealed that 12 isolates (25%) belonged to AG-2, while 36 isolates (75%) belonged to AG-4. Pathogenicity test on flax cultivar Shkha 1, under greenhouse conditions, showed that the pathogenic isolates in the pre-emergence stage represented 91.67 and 77.72% within AG-2 and AG-4, respectively. However, the pathogenic isolates of AG-4 representing 58.23% of the total isolates as well as the highest percentage of the pathogenic isolates (71.79%). This observations held true in the case of plant height and dry weight. These results indicate that both AGs 2 and 4 are important in the etiology of flax seedling blight. The importance of AG-2 is due to its high virulence, while the importance of AG-4 is due to its high prevalence .Cluster analysis suggested that, within each AG, isolates could be separated into subgroups with specific virulence patterns.
El-Hawary, O., Omar, M., Hussein, E., Mosa, A., & Mostafa, M. (2008). CHARACTRIZATION OF ANASTOMOSIS GROUPS AND EVALUATION OF PATHOGENICTY OF Rhizoctonia solani ISOLATES INVOLVED IN FLAX SEEDLING BLIGHT.. Journal of Plant Production, 33(3), 1985-1995. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2008.135713
MLA
Ola G. El-Hawary; M. R. Omar; E. M. Hussein; A. A. Mosa; M. H. Mostafa. "CHARACTRIZATION OF ANASTOMOSIS GROUPS AND EVALUATION OF PATHOGENICTY OF Rhizoctonia solani ISOLATES INVOLVED IN FLAX SEEDLING BLIGHT.", Journal of Plant Production, 33, 3, 2008, 1985-1995. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2008.135713
HARVARD
El-Hawary, O., Omar, M., Hussein, E., Mosa, A., Mostafa, M. (2008). 'CHARACTRIZATION OF ANASTOMOSIS GROUPS AND EVALUATION OF PATHOGENICTY OF Rhizoctonia solani ISOLATES INVOLVED IN FLAX SEEDLING BLIGHT.', Journal of Plant Production, 33(3), pp. 1985-1995. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2008.135713
VANCOUVER
El-Hawary, O., Omar, M., Hussein, E., Mosa, A., Mostafa, M. CHARACTRIZATION OF ANASTOMOSIS GROUPS AND EVALUATION OF PATHOGENICTY OF Rhizoctonia solani ISOLATES INVOLVED IN FLAX SEEDLING BLIGHT.. Journal of Plant Production, 2008; 33(3): 1985-1995. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2008.135713
)
View on SCiNiTO