• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Mansour, A. (2009). RESPONSE OF TWO MAIZE HYBRIDS TO UREA FERTILIZATION UNDER APPLICATION OF HYDROQUINONE UREASE INHIBITOR.. Journal of Plant Production, 34(5), 4977-4990. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2009.117349
A. A. Mansour. "RESPONSE OF TWO MAIZE HYBRIDS TO UREA FERTILIZATION UNDER APPLICATION OF HYDROQUINONE UREASE INHIBITOR.". Journal of Plant Production, 34, 5, 2009, 4977-4990. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2009.117349
Mansour, A. (2009). 'RESPONSE OF TWO MAIZE HYBRIDS TO UREA FERTILIZATION UNDER APPLICATION OF HYDROQUINONE UREASE INHIBITOR.', Journal of Plant Production, 34(5), pp. 4977-4990. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2009.117349
Mansour, A. RESPONSE OF TWO MAIZE HYBRIDS TO UREA FERTILIZATION UNDER APPLICATION OF HYDROQUINONE UREASE INHIBITOR.. Journal of Plant Production, 2009; 34(5): 4977-4990. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2009.117349

RESPONSE OF TWO MAIZE HYBRIDS TO UREA FERTILIZATION UNDER APPLICATION OF HYDROQUINONE UREASE INHIBITOR.

Article 19, Volume 34, Issue 5, May 2009, Page 4977-4990  XML PDF (460.61 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2009.117349
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
A. A. Mansour*
Plant Production (Agronomy) Dept., Efficient Prod. Inst., Zagazig Univ., Egypt.
Abstract
Two field experiments were conducted during 2004 and 2005 summer seasons at Gaziret-Hanout,Kafr Sakr District, Sharkia Governorate, Egypt to study the response of two maize hybrids (SC 122 and TWC 310) to three levels of urea fertilization levels (75,100 and 125 kgN/fad) under application of three hydroquinone (HQ) urease inhibitor levels (0, 2.25 and 3.25 kg HQ/100 kg N). The adopted experimental design was split-split plot with three replicates.
The results revealed that TWC 310 maize hybrid was superior in each of plant height, number of ears /plant, number of rows/ ear, number of grains / row, number of grains / ear, 100 - grain weight, oil percentage and both grain and oil yields / fad compared to SC122 which superior in ear length and protein percentage. However, both tested hybrids gave almost the same protein yield/fad. Increasing N levels from 75 to 100kg N/fad resulted in a significant increase in plant height, 100-grain weight, protein percentage and protein yield/fad, while the increase in urea-N levels up to 125kgN/fad increased significantly all other studied characters, except oil percentage which significantly decreased by any increase in N levels up to 125KgN/fad. Treating urea fertilizer with HQ urease inhibitor at the rate of 2.25kgHQ/100 kg N increased significantly both plant height and 100-grain weight, while increasing HQ levels up to 3.25kgHQ/100 kg N resulted in a significant increase in the other most studied characters compared with untreated urea. Any further HQ increment caused further reduction in oil percentage.
Regarding the interaction effects, TWC 310 gave the higher number of grains/ ear when urea was treated with 3.25kgHQ/100kgN with a response rate of 25.66. Grain yield/ fad was responded to urea-N up to 100 kg N/fad when 2.25 or 3.25kg HQ/100kg N was added. The highest oil yield / fad was attained when 125 kg N/fad was applied and when urea treated with 3.25 kg HQ/100 kg N.
The results revealed positive and significant correlation coefficients between grain yield/ fad, and most of studied characters, while negative and significant correlation was found for grain yield related to oil percentage. The path analysis revealed that the direct effect of number of ears/plant was 17.06% being higher than that of 100-grain weight and number of grains/ear which was 15.18 and 5.11% of maize grain yield variation, respectively. Regression analysis revealed that number of ears/ plant and number of grains/ ear are similar to that of grain yield and each is of quadratic relationship with urea-N fertilization, while the response of 100-grain weight to urea-N fertilizer had a linear relationship. Hence, grain yield of maize could be increased by splitting the suitable nitrogen amount in order to be active in increasing 100-grain weight.
Statistics
Article View: 241
PDF Download: 320
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.